Comparative Study of Vector Control of Induction Motor by Using PI Controller and Fuzzy Controller

Kailash Chandra, Prashant Kushwaha, Sachin Sati

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2017R11

Citation: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Research in Intelligent and Computing in Engineering, Vijender Kumar Solanki, Vijay Bhasker Semwal, Rubén González Crespo, Vishwanath Bijalwan (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 10, pages 151–155 (2017)

Full text

Abstract. Induction Motors have wide kind of functions for the reason that of their advantages likes rugged progress, low rate and strong performance. In latest years, various sides are investigated concerning controlling induction motor. In prior yr's scalar control is use for controlling purpose it is also referred to as V/F control. It is vitally easy procedure but the foremost hazards of this procedure are terrible dynamic performance and likewise it takes extra time to come in steady position. After this system vector control is used. Vector control process is more intricate as evaluate to scalar control. The VCIM power includes the decoupling of stator current factor which produces flux and torque of induction motor. It has servable advantages like excellent transient and dynamic performance. However it has some risks like massive ripple in torque within the time of beginning of IM. On this paper, an induction motor (IM) velocity control utilizing, PI controller system and vector control with fuzzy good judgment has been simulated and developed. The comparative be trained of VCIM with fuzzy logic and VCIM with PI is done on MATLAB/SIMULINK program. Results show the effectiveness of vector control with fuzzy logic controller over natural PI established vector control process.

References

1. Bose, Bimal K. “MPE and AC Drives” New Delhi, Prentice-Hall, 2002.
2. Novotny, “Selecting the flux reference for induction machine drives in the field weakening region,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 28, pp. 1353–1358, Nov. /Dec. 1992.
3. J. W. Finch, “Application of estimation technique in vector controlled induction motor drives,” IEE Conference Proceeding, London, July 1990, pp. 358–363.
4. Lee Zihong, “Methods for improving performance of PI type fuzzy logic controller,” IEEE trans. on fuzzy systems, vol.1, no. 4, Nov 1993.
5. Masiala M., Salmon J., “Fuzzy self tuning speed control of an indirect field-oriented control induction motor,” IEEE Trans. industry appl., vol. 44 , No. 6 ,Dec 2008.
6. Mudi R.K. and Pal N. R., “A robust self tuning scheme for PI and PD type fuzzy controllers,” IEEE Trans. fuzzy systems, vol. 7, no. 1, Feb 1999.
7. Sun J, P. Su, and L. Li, “Application of self-adjusting fuzzy controller in a vector-controlled induction motor drive,” in Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron. Motion Control, Aug. 15–18, 2000, vol. 3.
8. Bhadra S. N., D. Kastha, and S .Banerjee, Wind Electrical Systems, Oxford University Press, New
9. Gilberto C D Souse, Bimal K Bose, “A fuzzy set theory based control of phase controlled converter DC motor drive”, IEEE Transactions On Power Delivery, vol. 14, no. 2, july 2011.