Logo FedCSIS

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 24

Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation

Logo PTI

Impact of Banking Sector wise differences on High-Performance Work Practices


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2020KM12

Citation: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation, Shivani Agarwal, Darrell Norman Burrell, Vijender Kumar Solanki (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 24, pages 151155 ()

Full text

Abstract. The objective of this research paper is to comprehend the aspects of High-Performance Work-Practices pertinent to Government Undertaking public sector banks vis-à-vis their counterpart of private sector banks. The sample consists of 800 people, out of which 400 were public sector bank and 400 were from private sector banks. High-Performance Work Practices was measured through a four-dimensioned scale developed by Delery and Doty (1996). Significant differences regarding High-Performance Work Practices after data collection were tested using t-test. The findings reported noteworthy variance in the demonstration of many of the influencing factors of High-Performance Work Practices between the studied groups. The insights gained through this paper can be utilized to improve the level of High-Performance Outcome Work-Practices among the Government owned-public sector bank and privately owned-private sector banks. This study represents the data and delivers insights of the dimensions of High-Performance Outcome Work-Practices of the workforce.


  1. Appelbaum, E. & Batt, R. (1995). ‘Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and, If So, Who Benefits?’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(3), 353-378.
  2. Cappelli, P. & Neumark, D. (2001). ‘Do High-Performance Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 4, 737-75
  3. Delery, J. and Doty, D.H. (1996), “Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource administration: test of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions”, Academy of Administration Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 802-835.
  4. Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic administration journal, 26(1), 25-45.
  5. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of administration, 28(4), 517-543.
  6. Obeidat, S., Mitchell, R. and Bray, M. (2016), "The link between High-Performance work practices and Banksal performance: Empirically validating the conceptualization of HPWP according to the AMO model", Workforce Relations, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2015-0163
  7. Odiaka, K., & Chang, K. (2019). HPWP (High-Performance Work Practices) and Its Role on Promoting the Workforce Performance in the Nigerian Hotel Industry. Journal of Banksal Psychology, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v19i6.2661
  8. Thompson, P., (2001) “Systems of Production, Markets, Banks and Performance”, Workforce Relation, 25(3), 627-629.
  9. Wu, L., Wei, L. Q., Zhang, Y., & Han, T. (2011). Workforce experienced HPWPs and job performance: Roles of person-job fit and intrinsic motivation. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5(3), 344-363.
  10. Agarwal, S. (2020). Gender Differences in Quality of Work Life: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO), 10(4), 52-59 (ISSN: 2155-6393).