Logo PTI Logo icrmat

Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 28

Impact of the Vietnam – EAEU FTA on the trade between Vietnam and Eurasian Economic Union


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2021KM53

Citation: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation, Vu Dinh Khoa, Shivani Agarwal, Gloria Jeanette Rincon Aponte, Nguyen Thi Hong Nga, Vijender Kumar Solanki, Ewa Ziemba (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 28, pages 9198 ()

Full text

Abstract. This study uses a structural gravity model of trade to examine the impact of the Vietnam - Eurasian Economic Union free trade agreement (FTA Vietnam - EAEU) on exports and imports between Vietnam and its member countries before and after the agreement. The model is tested on a sample of industry-level panel data from 2001 to 2019, the author estimates the fixed-effects model (FEM) in the country - paired with the number of observations obtained is 5,386 observations forming a repeat sample, unbalanced. The paper also performs Pseudo Poisson maximum likelihood estimation (PPML) is also applied to solve the zero trade issue and the presence of heteroskedasticity. The results indicate that the agreement leads to``trade creation'', import and export turnover increases compared to before the agreement. The authors propose that the two sides need to boost to produce and export the comparative advantage products in order to seize preferential treatment from the agreement without affecting competition and complementing each other


  1. Anderson, J. (1978), A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Model of Factor Flows (No. 85), Boston College Department of Economics.
  2. Anderson, J.E., and Van Wincoop. E. (2003), Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle, American Economic Review, 93(1), pp 170 – 192.
  3. Athukorala, P.C. (2006), Trade policy reforms and the structure of protection in Vietnam, World Economy, 29(2), pp. 161 – 187.
  4. Adarov, A. and Ghodsi, M. (2020), The impact of the EAEU – Iran preferential Trade Agreement, Working Paper 179, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
  5. Bhagwati, J. and Srivinivasan, T.N. (2002), Trade and poverty in the poor countries, American Economic Review, No92(2), 180 – 183.
  6. Berg, M.A. & Krueger, A.O. (2003), Trade, growth and property: A selective survey, International Monetary Fund.
  7. Baier, S.L. & Bergstrand, J.H. (2009), Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International trade?, Journal of International Economics, Vol.71, pp. 72-95.
  8. Baldwin, R., and Taglioni, D. (2006), Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12516.
  9. Carrere C. (2006), Revisiting the effect of regional trading agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the Gravity model, European Economic Review, No.50, pp.223 – 247.
  10. Cassing, J., Trewin, R., Vanzetti, D., Truong Dinh Tuyen, Nguyen Anh Duong, Le Quang Lan, Le Trieu Dung (2010), Impact assessment of Free Trade Agreement on Vietnam’s Economy, MUTRAP.
  11. Diao, X. & Somwaru, A. (2000), A Dynamic Evaluation of the Effects of A Free Trade Area of the Americas – An Intertemporal, Global General Equilibrium Model, Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 16, No1, pp. 21 – 47.
  12. Deardoff, A. V. (2004), Local Comparative Advantage: Trade Costs and the Pattern of Trade, University of Michigan Research Seminar in International Economics, Working Paper No. 500
  13. Do, Tri Thai (2006), A gravity model for trade between Vietnam & twenty – three European countries, Doctor Department of Economics & Soceity, Dalarne University.
  14. Egger P. (2000), A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation, Economics Letters Vol. 66 (1), pp.25-31.
  15. Evans D., M. Gasiorek, A. Ghoneim, P. M. Haynes, P. Holmes, L. Iacovone, K. Jackson, S. Iwanow, S Robinson and J. Rollo (2006), Assessing regional trade agreements with developing countries: Shallow and Deep Integration, Trade, Productivity, and Economic Performance, University of Sussex Press, United Kingdom
  16. Feenstra, R.C. (2002), Border Effects and the Gravity Equation: Consistent Methods for Estimation, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp. 491 – 506.
  17. Fukao, K. Okubo, T. and Stern, R. M. (2003), An Econometric Analysis of Trade Diversion under NAFTA, Research Seminar in International Economics, The University of Michigan, Discussion Paper No.491
  18. Fedorov, N.V. (2018), The free trade agreement between the EAEU and Vietnam as a factor of Russia – Vietnamese relations, Comparative Politics Russia, No. 1, pp. 74-90.
  19. Krueger, A.O. (1997), Free Trade Agreements versus Customs Unions, Journal of Deveplopment Economics, 54(1), pp 169 – 187.
  20. Krugman, P.R. (2009), International Economics: Theory and Policy, 8/E: Pearson Education India.
  21. Linnermann, H. (1966), An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, North – Holland Publishing, Nertherland.
  22. Learner, E.E. (1988), Cross – section estimation of the effect of trade barriers, in Feenstra, R. (Ed): Emperical Methods for International Trade, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  23. Leke, S.K. (2012), Economic integration and the internal governance of member states: A case study of CEMAC and Cameroon, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  24. Matyas, L., (1998), The gravity model: Some econometric considerations, The World Economy, 21 (3), pp. 397 – 401.
  25. Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, D. F. and Horsewood, N. (2009), Are Regional Trading Agreements Beneficial? Static and Dynamic Panel Gravity Models, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 20 (1), pp. 46-65.
  26. MacMillan, M., Rodrik, D. & Verduzco – Gallo, I. (2014), Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth, with an update on Africa, World Development, Vol. 63 (1), pp 11 – 32.
  27. Nguyễn Tiến Dũng (2011), Tác động của khu vực thương mại tự do ASEAN – Hàn Quốc đến thương mại Việt Nam, Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQG Hà Nội, Kinh tế and Kinh doanh, số 27, trang 219 – 331.
  28. Nguyen Hai Tho (2013), Determinants of Vietnam’s exports: A gravity Model approach, Master of Science in Finance and Economics, Martin De Tours School of Managment and Economics.
  29. Hapsari, I.M and Mangunsong, C. (2006), Determinants of AFTA Members’ Trade Flows and Potential for Trade Diversion, Working Paper Series, No. 21, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), Bangkok.
  30. Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2014), Gravity equations: Workhorse, Toolkit and Cookbook, In handbook of International Economics, Vol.4, pp. 131 – 195, Elsevier.
  31. Poyhonen (1963), P., A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries, Welwirtschaftliches Archiv 90, No 1, pp. 93 – 100.
  32. Plummer, M. G., Cheong, D., and Hamanaka, S. (2010), Methodology for Impact Assessment of Free Trade Agreements, Asian Development Bank (ADB).
  33. Riedel, J. (1997), The Vietnamese economy in the 1990s, Asia – Pacific Economic Literature, 11(2), pp. 58 – 65.
  34. Rojid, S. (2006), Comesa Trade Potential: A Gravity Approach, Applied Economics Letters, Vol.13, No.14, pp. 947 – 951.
  35. Romalis, J., (2007), NAFTA’s and CUSFTA’s impact on international trade, The Review of Economics and Statistics (2007) 89 (3): pp.416–435.
  36. Ramstetter, E.D. & Phan, N.M. (2013), Productivity, ownership, and producer conectration in transition: Futher evidence from Vietnamese manufaturing, Journal of Asia Economics, No 25, pp. 28 – 42.
  37. Santos – Paulino, A. & Thirlwall, A.P. (2004), The impact of trade liberalization on export, imports and the balance of payments of developing countries, The Economic Journal, 114 (493), 50 – 72.
  38. Santos Silva, J.M.C., Tenreyo, S. (2011), Further simulation evidence on the performance of the poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator, Economic Letters, Vol. 112, pp. 220-222.
  39. Tinbergen (1962), J., Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economy Policy, The Tweentieth Century Fund, New York.
  40. Trần Văn Thọ (2002), AFTA in the Dynamic Perspective of Asia Trade, Jcer Discussion Paper No 77, Japan Center for Economic Research.
  41. Tran, K.N. & Heo, Y. (2009), Impact of trade liberlization on employment in Vietnam: A system generalized method of moments estimation, The Developing Economies, 47(1), 81 – 103.
  42. Thu, L.A, Fang, S. and Kessani, S.S (2019), Factors influencing Vietnam’s handicraft export with the gravity model, Journal of Economics and Development, Vol.21, No.2, pp. 156 – 171.
  43. Viner, J. (1950), The Customs Union Issue, New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  44. Vanzetti, D. and Pham, H.L (2006), Vietnam’s Trade Policy Dilemmas, Paper preseted at the The Ninth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  45. Vũ Thanh Hương (2017), Hiệp định thương mại tự do Việt Nam - EU: Tác động đối với thương mại giữa hai bên và hàm ý cho Việt Nam (Vietnam-EU Free Trade Agreement: Implications for two sides trade and effects for Vietnam). Luận án tiến sĩ kinh tế, Trường Đại học Kinh tế, ĐHQG – Hà Nội.
  46. Van Su Ha and Hoi Le Quoc (2019), The impact of participation in the comprehensive and progressive trans – pacific partnership agreement on exports: The case of Vietnam, Management Science Letters, Vol.9, pp. 1269 – 1280.
  47. Urata Shujiro and Okabe Misa (2007), The impacts of free trade agreements on trade flows: An application of the gravity model approach, RIETI Discussion paper series 07 – E – 052.
  48. Wang, Q. (2001), Import – Reducing Effect of Trade Barriers: A cross – Country Investigation, IMF Working Paper, No. 1/216. Địa chỉ: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=880899 [Truy cập ngày 15/04/2019].