Logo PTI Logo icrmat

Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 28

Intention of Vietnamese Enterprises's digital transformation

, ,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2021KM54

Citation: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation, Vu Dinh Khoa, Shivani Agarwal, Gloria Jeanette Rincon Aponte, Nguyen Thi Hong Nga, Vijender Kumar Solanki, Ewa Ziemba (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 28, pages 169–174 ()

Full text

Abstract. There have been many studies on digital transformation in recent times, but these studies focused on clarifying the concept, content, and implementation of digital transformation. There have not been many studies on the attitudes and intentions of enterprises to digital transformation (DT). This paper proposes factors affecting DT intention including perceived usefulness, trust, innovation, perceived risk to investigate attitudes about DT and examines the impaction of attitude and subject norms factors on the digital transformation intention of enterprises. A questionnaire designed and sent to 337 Vietnamese enterprises in different fields of activity. This study uses Structural Equation Model (SEM). The perceived usefulness, Innovation factors effect to the attitude possitively leading to the Intention of DT of enterprises, whereas the perception of pisk has a negative impact. Attitudes towards digital transformation and Subjective Norms have a positive impact on digital transformation intention. This paper helps Vietnamese government authorities to have a basis to promote and support Vietnamese enterprises in digital transformation

References

  1. A. Ustundag and E. Cevikcan, Industry 4.0: managing the digital transformation. Springer, 2017.
  2. A. Bharadwaj, O. A. El Sawy, P. A. Pavlou, and N. v. J. M. q. Venkatraman, "Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights," pp. 471-482, 2013.
  3. G. Piccinini, Physical computation: A mechanistic account. OUP Oxford, 2015.
  4. M. Fitzgerald, N. Kruschwitz, D. Bonnet, and M. J. M. s. m. r. Welch, "Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative," vol. 55, no. 2, p. 1, 2014.
  5. G. Westerman, M. Tannou, D. Bonnet, P. Ferraris, A. J. M. M. McAfee, and M. Capgemini Consulting, "The Digital Advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry," vol. 2, pp. 2-23, 2012.
  6. R. Agarwal, G. Gao, C. DesRoches, and A. K. J. I. s. r. Jha, "Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead," vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 796-809, 2010.
  7. A. Majchrzak, M. L. Markus, and J. J. M. q. Wareham, "Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges," vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 267-277, 2016.
  8. T. Hess, C. Matt, A. Benlian, and F. J. M. Q. E. Wiesböck, "Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy," vol. 15, no. 2, 2016.
  9. L. Heilig, S. Schwarze, and S. Voß, "An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports," 2017.
  10. D. R. Schallmo and C. A. Williams, "History of digital transformation," in Digital Transformation Now!: Springer, 2018, pp. 3-8.
  11. D. J. Bowersox, D. J. Closs, and R. W. J. S. C. M. R. Drayer, "The digital transformation: technology and beyond," vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 22-29, 2005.
  12. S. J. J. S. Berman and Leadership, "Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models," 2012.
  13. D. Schallmo, C. A. Williams, and L. J. D. D. I. Boardman, "Digital transformation of business models—best practice, enablers, and roadmap," pp. 119-138, 2020.
  14. I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, and N. J. G. i. q. Haug, "Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews," vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101385, 2019.
  15. A. Meijer and V. J. G. I. Q. Bekkers, "A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field," vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 237-245, 2015.
  16. I. J. O. b. Ajzen and h. d. processes, "The theory of planned behavior," vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211, 1991.
  17. C. J. Armitage and M. J. B. j. o. s. p. Conner, "Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review," vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 471-499, 2001.
  18. N. L. Jimmieson, M. Peach, and K. M. J. T. j. o. a. b. s. White, "Utilizing the theory of planned behavior to inform change management: An investigation of employee intentions to support organizational change," vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 237-262, 2008.
  19. F. D. Davis, "A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results," Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.
  20. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. J. M. s. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models," vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, 1989.
  21. T. Oliveira and M. F. J. E. J. o. I. S. E. Martins, "Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level," vol. 14, no. 1, pp. pp110‑121-pp110‑121, 2011.
  22. M. S. Featherman and P. A. J. I. j. o. h.-c. s. Pavlou, "Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective," vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 451-474, 2003.
  23. Z. Hu, S. Ding, S. Li, L. Chen, and S. Yang, "Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model," Symmetry, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 340, 2019.
  24. M. K. Lee and E. Turban, "A trust model for consumer internet shopping," International Journal of electronic commerce, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75-91, 2001.
  25. J. D. Lewis and A. Weigert, "Trust as a social reality," Social forces, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 967-985, 1985.
  26. D. H. McKnight and N. L. Chervany, "What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology," International journal of electronic commerce, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 35-59, 2001.
  27. A. Kesharwani and S. S. J. I. j. o. b. m. Bisht, "The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model," 2012.
  28. H. R. Khedmatgozar and A. J. E. C. R. Shahnazi, "The role of dimensions of perceived risk in adoption of corporate internet banking by customers in Iran," vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 389-412, 2018.
  29. T. Leicht, A. Chtourou, and K. B. J. T. J. o. H. T. M. R. Youssef, "Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption," vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2018.
  30. A. Adeiza, N. Azizi Ismail, and M. J. I. J. o. M. S. Marissa Malek, "An empirical examination of the major relationship factors affecting franchisees’ overall satisfaction and intention to stay," vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31-62, 2017.
  31. C. Kim, M. Mirusmonov, and I. J. C. i. h. b. Lee, "An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment," vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 310-322, 2010.
  32. Z. Hu, S. Ding, S. Li, L. Chen, and S. J. S. Yang, "Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model," vol. 11, no. 3, p. 340, 2019.
  33. A. Gupta, N. J. J. o. R. Arora, and C. Services, "Understanding determinants and barriers of mobile shopping adoption using behavioral reasoning theory," vol. 36, pp. 1-7, 2017.
  34. M. Fishbein, J. Jaccard, A. R. Davidson, I. Ajzen, and B. Loken, "Predicting and understanding family planning behaviors," in Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior: Prentice Hall, 1980.
  35. V. Venkatesh and F. D. J. M. s. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies," vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000.
  36. A. H. S. J. J. o. F. S. M. Zolait, "An examination of the factors influencing Yemeni Bank users’ behavioural intention to use Internet banking services," vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 76-94, 2010.
  37. A. Bhattacherjee, "Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices," 2012.
  38. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics," ed: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1981.
  39. L. t. Hu and P. M. Bentler, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives," Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-55, 1999.
  40. B. Wheaton, B. Muthen, D. F. Alwin, and G. F. Summers, "Assessing reliability and stability in panel models," Sociological methodology, vol. 8, pp. 84-136, 1977.
  41. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach," Psychological bulletin, vol. 103, no. 3, p. 411, 1988.
  42. D. W. Gerbing and J. C. Anderson, "Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models," Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 132-160, 1992.
  43. T. Leicht, A. Chtourou, and K. B. Youssef, "Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption," The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2018.