Position Papers of the 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2022F272

Citation: Position Papers of the 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 31, pages 89–93 (2022)

Full text

Abstract. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals have been encouraged to obtain COVID-19 vaccinations. As part of the vaccination process, it is necessary to verify the identity before obtaining the vaccines. Incorrectly identifying the individuals could lead to serious consequences. For example, an incorrect vaccination schedule ( e.g., incorrect timing between doses and incompatible brands) may cause undesired side effects to an individual, so it should be more accurate and convenient to identify themselves whenever and wherever people are required. One of the most effective and commonly used identification methods is face-to-face (or offline) identification. However, the method is typically time-consuming and is not suitable for the current situation where individuals should avoid direct contact. Hence, there is a growing trend for an online identification method where individuals use digital credentials to identify themselves. This paper suggests an online authentication system for improvements by investigating how different people authenticate themselves online in each country for COVID-19 vaccination. Comparing the online authentication systems between a country that have their national identification cards or not makes the Pros and Cons of both systems clear, particularly, in Japan and Thailand.

References

1. Tadashi Okada, Tadanobu Bandou, Motonobu Abekawa, Tashuhiro Yonekura, The consideration about of public identification for proving, IEICE Technical Committee, 2015, pp. 3-6.
2. Hiroyuki Onishi, The function and sysytem of identity cards in Japan, Minpaku-tsushin 138, 2014, pp. 27.
3. Igarashi Yasufumi, The identity confirming system problem in Japan on Tohoku earthquake , Fukuoka University, 2013, pp. 1-10.
4. ETDA, Reccomendation on ICT Standard for Electronic Transactions, ETDA, 2021, pp. 2-10.
5. Paul A. Grassi, James L. Fenton, Michael E. Garcia, Degital Identity Guidelines, NIST, 2017, SP 800-63-3.
6. Tatsuo Chaya, The historical consideration of the inhabitant resident’s file and that change law, Urban information systems institute, 2002, pp. 1-6.
7. The international university, Report on Research Study on the Current Status of National ID Systems in Other Countries, Global communication center, 2012, pp. 61.