Logo PTI Logo FedCSIS

Communication Papers of the 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 32

Top-down and bottom-up collaboration as a factor in the technological development of smart city. The example of Taipei


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2022F13

Citation: Communication Papers of the 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 32, pages 293299 ()

Full text

Abstract. The aim of the article was to identify the benefits and risks resulting from combining top-down and bottom-up initiatives in the context of the technological development of smart cities. In order to achieve the goal, an interview has been conducted with the Deputy Secretary General of GO Smart. It has been shown that the cooperation of top-down and bottom-up initiatives has a positive impact on the city's technological development. The most important benefits of this type of cooperation include increasing innovation and the level of creativity of technological solutions introduced in a smart city, opening the city to new opportunities, as well as increasing the activity of the private sector and the involvement of residents in the city's development. The main risks are related to determining the scope of responsibility for individual initiators when implementing a project as well as the duration of processing applications.


  1. The World Bank, Urban population (% of total population), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS (accessed on 28. March 2022).
  2. C.S. Lai, Y. Jia, Z. Donk, D. Wang, Y. Tao, Q. H. Lai, R. Wong, A. Zobaa, R. Wu and L. L. Lai, “A Review of Technical Standards for Smart Cities”, Clean Technologies, vol. 2, 2020, pp. 290–310, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol2030019.
  3. K. Lenkenhoff, U. Wilkens, M. Zheng, T. Süβe, B. Kuhlenk ötter, X. Ming, “Key challenges of digital business ecosystem development and how to cope with them”, 10th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems, IPS2, Linköping, Sweden, May 2018, pp. 29-31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.082.
  4. C. Y. Chang, L. C. Chien, Y. H. Chang, E. C. Kuo and Y. S. Hwang, “A Smart Public Security Strategy: The New Taipei City Technology Defense Plan”, 23rd KES International Conference on Knowledge- Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES), Budapest, Hungary, vol. 159, Sep. 04-06, 2019, pp. 1715-1719, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.342.
  5. Y. S. Chen, C. K. Lin, S. F. Chen and S. H. Chen, “Two Advanced Models of the Function of MRT Public Transportation in Taipei”, Electronics, vol. 10(9), 1048, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics10091048.
  6. C. F. Chen, “Design and Development of Cloud Learning Tool for English Sentence Patterns”, International Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 9, issue 6, 2019, pp. 93-105, http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p93.
  7. I. C. Chang, S. Jou, M. Chung, “Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei: The smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition”, Urban Studies, vol. 58(3), 2021, pp. 559-580, doi: 10.1177/0042098020947908.
  8. C. Nicolas, J. Kim and S. Chi, “Natural language processing-based characterization of top-down communication in smart cities for enhancing citizen alignment”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 66, 102674, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102674.
  9. K. Eckerberg, T. Bjarstig and A. Zachrisson, “Incentives for Collaborative Governance: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Initiatives in the Swedish Mountain Region”, Mountain Research and Development, vol. 35, issue 3, 2015, pp. 289-298, http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00068.1.
  10. G. O. Huby, A. Cook and R. Kirchhoff, “Can we mandate partnership working? Top down meets bottom up in structural reforms in Scotland and Norway”, Journal of Integrated Care, vol. 26, issue 2, 2018, pp. 109-119, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JICA-11-2017-0041.
  11. S. Zhou, H. Fu, S. Tao, Y. Han and M. Mao, “Bridging the top-down and bottom-up approaches to smart urbanization? A reflection on Beijing’s Shuangjing International Sustainable Development Community Pilot”, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.2014939.
  12. H. Kaplan, M. Gurven, “Top-down and bottom-up research in biodemography”, Demographic Research, vol. 19, 2008, pp. 1587-1602, http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.44.
  13. I. van Meerkerk, “Top-down versus bottom-up pathways to collaboration between governments and citizens: reflecting on different participation traps”, in Collaboration in public service delivery: promise and pitfalls, A. Kekez, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, Ed. 2019, pp. 149-167, http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788978583.
  14. R. E. Hall, B. Bowerman, J. Braverman, J. Taylor, H. Todosow and U. von Wimmersperg, The vision of a smart city, Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY, 2000.
  15. J. Bélissent, “Getting Clever About Smart Cities: New Opportunities Require New Business Models”, Cambridge: Forrester, 2010, pp. 244-277.
  16. M. Zuccalà, E. Verga, “Enabling energy smart cities through urban sharing ecosystems”, Energy Procedia, vol. 111, 2017 pp. 826-835, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.245
  17. S. Hajduk, D. Jelonek, “A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy”, Energies, vol. 14.9, 2691, http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092691.
  18. J. Yang, Y. Kwon and D. Kim, “Regional Smart City Development Focus: The South Korean National Strategic Smart City Problem”, IEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc445 Hose Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08855-4141, vol. 9, pp. 7193-7210, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047139.
  19. H. Allahar, “What are the Challenges of Building a Smart City?”, Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 10, issue 9, 2020, pp. 38-48, http://dx.doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1388.
  20. A. Mahizhnan, “Smart cities: the Singapore case”, Cities, vol. 16(1), 1999, pp. 13-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00050-X.
  21. D. Walentek, “Datafication Process in the Concept of Smart Cities”, Energies, vol. 14, issue 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14164861.
  22. G. Verhulsdonck, J. Weible, S. Helser, N. Hajduk, “Smart Cities, Playable Cities, and Cybersecurity: A Systematic Review”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10.1080/10447318.2021.2012381.
  23. A. Alibasic, R. Junaibi, Z. Aung, W. Woon, M. Omar, “Cybersecurity for Smart Cities: A Brief Review”, Data Analytics for Renewable Energy Integration, vol. 10097, 2017, pp. 22-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50947-1_3.
  24. A. Gyrard and M. Serrano, “A Unified Semantic Engine for Internet of Things and Smart Cities: From Sensor Data to End-Users Applications”, IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Data Intensive Systems, Dec. 11-13, 2015, Sydney, Australia, pp. 718-725, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DSDIS.2015.59.
  25. V. K. Akram, M. Challenger, “Connectivity Maintenance in IoT-based Mobile networks: Approaches and Challenges”, Position and Communication Paper of the 16th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence System, vol. 26, pp. 145-149, http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2021F102.
  26. L. Patton, “Kantian Essentialism in the Metaphysical Foundations”, The Monist, vol. 100, 2017, pp. 342-356, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx014.
  27. A. Damianou, C. Ek, L. Boorman, N. Lawrence and T. Prescott, “A top-down approach for a synthetic autobiographical memory system”, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9222, pp. 280-292, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22979-9_28.
  28. C. Connon, “Approaches to corneal tissue engineering: top-down or bottom-up?”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 110, 2015, pp. 15-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.004.
  29. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ definition/american_english/top-down (accessed on 1. April 2022).
  30. P. Jones, “Marine protected areas in the UK: challenges in combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to governance”, Environmental Conservation, vol. 39(3), 2012, pp. 248-258, doi: 10.1017/S0376892912000136.
  31. F. Cugurullo, “Exposing smart cities and eco-cities: Frankenstein urbanism and the sustainability challenges of the experimental city”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 50(1), 2018, pp. 73–92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17738535.
  32. R. G. Hollands, “Critical interventions into the corporate smart city”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 8(1), 2015, pp. 61-77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011.
  33. Smart Taipei, https://smartcity.taipei/ (accessed on 1. April 2022).
  34. P. Thakuriah, L. Dirks and Y. M. Keita, “Digital infomediaries and civic hacking in emerging urban data initiatives”, in: Seeing cities through Big data, P. Thakuriah, N. Tilahun, & M. Zellner (Eds.), Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 189–207.
  35. S. Niederer and R. Priester, “Smart citizens: Exploring the tools of the urban bottom-up movement”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 25(2–3), 2016, pp. 137–152, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9249-6.
  36. Global Organisation of Smart Cities, https://www.citiesgosmart.org/publications (accessed on 25. March 2022).
  37. Departament of Information Technology Taipei City, https://smartcity.taipei/download/26/0 (accessed on 25. March 2022).
  38. Smart City Index 2022, https://www.imd.org/smart-city-observatory/home/ (accessed on 29. March 2022).
  39. Smart City Summit & Expo, https://en.smartcity.org.tw/index.php/en-us/ (accessed on 29. March 2022).
  40. L. Chen-Yu, City Lights: Dr Chen-Yu Lee, Director, Taipei Smart City Project Management Office, available: https://www.smartcitiesworld.net/city-lights/city-lights/city-lights-dr-chen-yu-lee-director-taipei-smart-city-project-management-office-4982 (accessed on 6. April 2022).
  41. Taipei City Government, Department of Information Technology, Smart Taipei. Government as a Platform. City as a Living Lab, available: https://smartcity.taipei/downloaddetail/2 (accessed on 6. April 2022).