Logo PTI Logo FedCSIS

Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS)

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 39

Towards to an interface design for a building operations CPS

, , , , , , ,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2024F2423

Citation: Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS), M. Bolanowski, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 39, pages 655–660 ()

Full text

Abstract. Cyber-physical systems (CPS) enable value creation in software. Nevertheless, there are challenges. We present a concept on how to approach the design and development of a software service, based on multiple CPS. We define our understanding of a specific CPS, specifying its graphical user interface components and architectural aspects, suggesting tools and design methodologies while explaining the alignment with existing approaches such as Industry 4.0 and SaaS. The multidisciplinary nature of CPS leads to several development challenges, and we focus our work on using design thinking techniques, methodologies, and tools that are valuable solutions and key to the sustainability of new designs. These insights may help researchers and industrial practitioners to develop and commercialize service-based CPS.

References

  1. Bitner, M., Ostrom, A., & Morgan, F. (2008) California Management Review Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation, p.92. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166446
  2. Dam, R. F. and Teo, Y. S. (2020, July 1). What Kind of Prototype Should You Create? Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-kind-of-prototype-should-you-create
  3. El-Haouzi, H. B., Valette, E., Krings, B. J., & Moniz, A. B. (2021). Social dimensions in cps & iot based automated production systems. Societies, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030098
  4. Gürdür, D., & Törngren, M. (2018). Visual Analytics for Cyber-physical Systems Development: Blending Design Thinking and Systems Thinking. Presented at the 15th Annual NordDesign Conference (NordDesign 2018). Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-232358
  5. Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF. (2016, June 3). What are Service Blueprints?. Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/service-blueprint
  6. Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
  7. Kalbach, J. (2016). Mapping experiences. O'Reilly Media.
  8. Lee, E. A. (2008, May). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In 2008 11th IEEE international symposium on object and component-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC) (pp. 363-369). IEEE.
  9. Milicic, A., El Kadiri, S., Perdikakis, A., Ivanov, P., & Kiritsis, D. (2014). Toward the definition of domain concepts and knowledge through the application of the user story mapping method. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 7(1), 3-16.
  10. Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things (Revised an). Basic Books (2013).
  11. Patton, J., & Economy, P. (2014). User story mapping: discover the whole story, build the right product. " O'Reilly Media, Inc."
  12. Romero, D., Hermosillo, G., Taherkordi, A., Nzekwa, R., Rouvoy, R., & Eliassen, F. (2013). The DigiHome service-oriented platform. Software - Practice and Experience, 43(10), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.1125
  13. Wang, F.-Y. (2010). The Emergence of Intelligent Enterprises: From CPS to CPSS. www.computer.org/intelligent.