Logo PTI Logo FedCSIS

Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS)

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 39

Dynamic relationship between population densities and air quality in the four largest Norwegian cities

,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2024F838

Citation: Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS), M. Bolanowski, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 39, pages 713718 ()

Full text

Abstract. Air pollution is a significant cause of health problems and disease worldwide. Considering the rapid urbanisation at a global scale in recent decades, resulting in more and more people in urban areas, cities deserve special attention in this regard. In this paper, we use air quality measurement data from 2010 to 2023 in the four largest Norwegian cities (Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim and Stavanger) and correlate it with the evolution of population densities for the same period. The empirical analysis focuses on nitrogen dioxides (NO2) and particular matter (PM2.5 and PM10) as critical pollutants in urban areas to verify whether their concentrations are affected by the increase in population densities for individual municipalities. In addition, we also correlate the data on air pollutants with different natural indicators such as temperature, air pressure, humidity and wind and the rate of motorisation in the cities of interest.

References

  1. Julian Allen, Michael Browne, and Tom Cherrett. Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form. Journal of transport geography, 24:45–57, 2012.
  2. Maximilian Auffhammer, Solomon M Hsiang, Wolfram Schlenker, and Adam Sobel. Using weather data and climate model output in economic analyses of climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2013.
  3. Rainald Borck and Philipp Schrauth. Population density and urban air quality. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 86:103596, 2021.
  4. Tone Bruun, Eva Marie-Louise Denison, Linn Gjersing, Trine Husøy, Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen, and Bjørn Heine Strand. Public health report–short version health status in norway 2018. 2018.
  5. Claire E Campbell, Devyn L Cotter, Katherine L Bottenhorn, Elisabeth Burnor, Hedyeh Ahmadi, W James Gauderman, Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez, Daniel Hackman, Rob McConnell, Kiros Berhane, et al. Air pollution and emotional behavior in adolescents across the us. medRxiv, 2023.
  6. Judith C Chow. Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 45(5):320–382, 1995.
  7. Alan Earnshaw and Norman Neill Greenwood. Chemistry of the Elements, volume 60. Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford, 1997.
  8. Marloes Eeftens, Rob Beelen, Kees De Hoogh, Tom Bellander, Giulia Cesaroni, Marta Cirach, Christophe Declercq, Audrius Dedele, Evi Dons, Audrey De Nazelle, et al. Development of land use regression models for pm2. 5, pm2. 5 absorbance, pm10 and pmcoarse in 20 european study areas; results of the escape project. Environmental science & technology, 46(20):11195–11205, 2012.
  9. US EPA. National ambient air quality standards for particulate matter, proposed rule. Fed Regist, 77:38889–39055, 2012.
  10. Jane Jacobs. Jane jacobs. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 21(1):13–25, 1961.
  11. Lu Liang and Peng Gong. Urban and air pollution: a multi-city study of long-term effects of urban landscape patterns on air quality trends. Scientific reports, 10(1):18618, 2020.
  12. Petros Mouzourides, Prashant Kumar, and Marina K-A Neophytou. Assessment of long-term measurements of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants in south-east mediterranean. Atmospheric Environment, 107:148–165, 2015.
  13. Petter Næss. Urban form and travel behavior: Experience from a nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land use, 5(2):21–45, 2012.
  14. Unted Nations. New urban agenda. In Habitat III–The United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development, 2017.
  15. Jonathan Norman, Heather L MacLean, and Christopher A Kennedy. Comparing high and low residential density: life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of urban planning and development, 132(1):10–21, 2006.
  16. Norwegian Environment Agency. Limit values and national objectives: Proposed long-term health-based national targets and revised limit values for local air quality. Report M-129-2014. Norwegian Environment Agency, Oslo, 2014. in Norwegian.
  17. Norwegian Institute of Public Health - NIPH. Air quality criteria: effects of air pollution on health. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 2013.
  18. Norwegian Institute of Public Health - NIPH. Public Health Report: Health Status in Norway 2018. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 2018.
  19. World Health Organization. Air quality guidelines: global update 2005: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization, 2006.
  20. C Arden Pope III and Douglas W Dockery. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. Journal of the air & waste management association, 56(6):709–742, 2006.
  21. Xiaoliang Qin, Lujian Hou, Jian Gao, and Shuchun Si. The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods. Science of the total environment, 715:136791, 2020.
  22. Raymond Unwin. The Town Extension Plan. Manchester University Press, 1912.
  23. Frank Lloyd Wright. The disappearing city. 1932.