Logo PTI Logo FedCSIS

Position Papers of the 21st Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 48

Tacit Knowledge and Hermeneutics: Critical Reflections on Automated Text Interpretation with Large Language Models

,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2026F5725

Citation: Jens Dörpinghaus,

Full text

Abstract. This study explores the interplay between tacit knowledge and hermeneutical interpretation within the domain of large language models (LLMs). In this study, we examine the question of whether automated systems can approximate interpretive practices that depend on implicit understanding, situated experience, and contextual embedding. To this end, we draw on philosophical accounts of tacit knowledge and traditions of hermeneutics. Utilizing a comparative experimental design, multiple LLMs are prompted to interpret texts from the domains of philosophy, theology, literature, and conversation. The findings suggest considerable variability and constrained reproducibility in the interpretive outcomes. These findings suggest that the core dimensions of tacit knowledge, particularly embodied inference and context-sensitive understanding, remain inaccessible to current generative models. The paper posits that hermeneutics cannot be reduced to formal pattern recognition and calls for refined theoretical and empirical criteria for evaluating machine-based interpretation.

References

  1. M. Polanyi, Personal knowledge. University of Chicago Press, 1958.
  2. S. Turner, “Polanyi and tacit knowledge,” in The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Implicit Cognition. Routledge, 2022, pp. 182–190.
  3. M. Tiemann, Wissensintensität von Berufen und ihre Entlohnung. Klassifikation und empirische Ergebnisse. BeltzJuventa, 2015, pp. 281–299.
  4. M. Lejeune, “Tacit knowledge: Revisiting the epistemology of knowledge,” McGill Journal of Education, vol. 46, pp. 91–105, 2011.
  5. L. Tomkins and V. Eatough, “Hermeneutics: interpretation, understanding and sense-making,” SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods, pp. 185–200, 2018.
  6. H.-G. Gadamer, “Destruktion and deconstruction,” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter, pp. 102–113, 1989.
  7. M. Polanyi, “Tacit knowing,” Philosophy Today, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 239, 1962.
  8. H. Collins, Tacit and explicit knowledge. University of Chicago press, 2019.
  9. H. G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und methode Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, 1960.
  10. H. M. Collins, “Tacit knowledge, trust and the q of sapphire,” Social studies of science, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 2001.
  11. B. Trubody, “When tacit is not tacit enough: A heideggerian critique of collins’“tacit” knowledge,” Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 315–335, 2013.
  12. D. Ingram, “Hermeneutics and truth,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 62–78, 1984.
  13. J. Loenhoff, “Tacit knowledge: Shared and embodied.” transcript Bielefeld, 2015, pp. 21–40.
  14. I. Nonaka, “The knowledge-creating company,” in The economic impact of knowledge. Routledge, 2009, pp. 175–187.
  15. T. Johnstone and D. R. Shanks, “Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 42, pp. 61–112, 2001.
  16. A. S. Reber, “Implicit learning of artificial grammars,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 6, pp. 855–863, 1967.
  17. G. S. Insch, N. McIntyre, and D. Dawley, “Tacit knowledge: A refinement and empirical test of the academic tacit knowledge scale,” The journal of psychology, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 561–580, 2008.
  18. V.-W. Mitchell, W. S. Harvey, and G. Wood, “Where does all the ‘know how’go? the role of tacit knowledge in research impact,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1664–1678, 2022.
  19. R. Maciag, “The hermeneutics of artificial text,” in Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum, vol. 8, no. 1. MDPI, 2024, p. 94.
  20. L. Henrickson and A. Meroño-Peñuela, “Prompting meaning: a hermeneutic approach to optimising prompt engineering with chatgpt,” AI & SOCIETY, pp. 1–16, 2023.
  21. L. Tiantian and M. Carl, “Toward practical hermeneutics of fourth paradigm ai for science,” «Technology and language», vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2024.
  22. K. Petković, “The truth and ai: Towards a new hermeneutic of the academic subject?” Sociologija, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 581–611, 2024.
  23. P. Pinell, “Does artificial intelligence speak our language?: A gadamerian assessment of generative language models,” Political Research Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 713–728, 2024.
  24. M. Heimann and A.-F. Hübener, “Circling the void: Using heidegger and lacan to think about large language models,” Cognitive Systems Research, p. 101349, 2025.
  25. A. Diržytė, “Large language models and the enhancement of human cognition: Some theoretical insights,” Filosofija. Sociologija, vol. 36, no. 1, 2025.
  26. M. Barnard and W. Otte, “Is the machine surpassing humans? large language models, structuralism, and liturgical ritual: A position paper,” International Journal of Practical Theology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 289–306, 2024.
  27. M. Chrostowski and A. J. Najda, “Chatgpt as a modern tool for bible teaching in confessional religious education: a german view,” Journal of Religious Education, pp. 1–20, 2024.
  28. R. Demichelis, “The hermeneutic turn of ai: Is the machine capable of interpreting?” arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12517, 2024.
  29. M. Gonzalez, “Beyond replacement: A hermeneutic phenomenological approach to human-ai collaboration,” in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–4.
  30. A. Elrod, “Uncovering theological and ethical biases in llms: An integrated hermeneutical approach employing texts from the hebrew bible,” HIPHIL Novum, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2–45, 2024.
  31. M. Trepczyński, “Religion, theology, and philosophical skills of llm– powered chatbots,” Disputatio Philosophica: International Journal on Philosophy and Religion, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–36, 2023.
  32. K. Karches, “Hermeneutics as impediment to ai in medicine,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, pp. 1–19, 2025.
  33. E. Krapp, R. Neuhaus, M. Hassenzahl, and M. Laschke, “In a quasisocial relationship with chatgpt. an autoethnography on engaging with prompt-engineered llm personas,” in Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2024, pp. 1–16.
  34. A. Li, H. Chen, H. Namkoong, and T. Peng, “Llm generated persona is a promise with a catch,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16527, 2025.
  35. U. Oevermann, “Zur analyse der struktur von soialen deutungsmustern,” 1973. [Online]. Available: https://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/ index/docId/4951/file/Struktur-von-Deutungsmuster-1973.pdf
  36. ——, “Sozialisation als prozess der krisenbewältigung,” in Sozialisationstheorie interdisziplinär – Aktuelle Perspektiven, D. Geulen and H. Veith, Eds. Lucius, 2004, pp. 155–181.
  37. J. Reichertz, “Die objektive hermeneutik – darstellung und kritik,” in Qualitative Forschung, E. König and P. Zedler, Eds. Beltz Verlag, 2002, pp. 123–156.
  38. A. Placani, “Anthropomorphism in ai: hype and fallacy,” AI and Ethics, vol. 4, pp. 691–698, 2024.
  39. D. Aarons, “Puns and tacit linguistic knowledge,” in The Routledge handbook of language and humor. Routledge, 2017, pp. 80–94.
  40. R. E. Day and L. Ma, “Rethinking unsaid information: Jokes and ideology,” in Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, 2011, pp. 63–67.
  41. J. Newirth, “Jokes and their relation to the unconscious: Humor as a fundamental emotional experience,” Psychoanalytic Dialogues, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 557–571, 2006.
  42. V. Tsakona, “Intertextuality and/in political jokes,” Lingua, vol. 203, pp. 1–15, 2018.
  43. D. Bathrick, The Powers of Speech: the Politics of Culture in the GDR. U of Nebraska Press, 1995.
  44. U. Altschüler and I. Kemble, “Ist die ddr-sprache abgewickelt?(has gdrlanguage been wound up?),” Journal of Area Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 12–24, 1993.
  45. U. Fix, Sprache, Sprachgebrauch und Diskurse in der DDR: ausgewählte Aufsätze. Frank & Timme GmbH, 2013, vol. 15.
  46. W. Thierse, “’sprich, damit ich dich sehe’. beobachtungen zum verhältnis von sprache und politik in der ddr-vergangenheit,” in Deutsch als Verkehrssprache in Europa. de Gruyter, 1993, pp. 114–126.
  47. A. Borgwardt, “Politik und literatur in der ddr,” in Im Umgang mit der Macht: Herrschaft und Selbstbehauptung in einem autoritären politischen System. Springer, 2002, pp. 77–136.
  48. I. Miethe, “„die universität dem volke!“entwicklungsphasen der arbeiterund-bauern-fakultäten (abf) der ddr,” Beiheft zum Report: Erwachsenenbildung und Demokratie, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 215–224, 2003.
  49. T. Krüger, “Tacit knowledge in the old testament,” Archaeology of Mind in the Hebrew Bible/Archäologie alttestamentlichen Denkens, p. 347, 2023.
  50. T. A. Demmons, “Tacit and tactile knowledge of god: Toward a theology of revelation for persons with intellectual disabilities,” Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 5–21, 2008.
  51. R. L. Gelwick, “From tacit knowing to a theory of faith1,” The Polanyi Society Periodical, p. 10, 2014.
  52. J. Dörpinghaus and M. Tiemann, “Do llms dream of antique hermeneutics? critical remarks on automated text interpretation,” in 2025 20th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE, 2025, pp. 687–692.
  53. P. Törnberg, “How to use llms for text analysis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13106, 2023.
  54. T. Fu, R. Ferrando, J. Conde, C. Arriaga, and P. Reviriego, “Why do large language models (llms) struggle to count letters?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18626, 2024.
  55. L. Nguyen and Y. Yan, “Evaluating the structural awareness of large language models on graphs: Can they count substructures?” Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’24), 2024.
  56. R. H. Tai, L. R. Bentley, X. Xia, J. M. Sitt, S. C. Fankhauser, A. M. Chicas-Mosier, and B. G. Monteith, “An examination of the use of large language models to aid analysis of textual data,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 23, p. 16094069241231168, 2024.