Logo PTI
Polish Information Processing Society
Logo FedCSIS

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 8

Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems

The EOM: An Adaptive Energy Option, State and Assessment Model for Open Hybrid Energy Systems

,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2016F392

Citation: Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 8, pages 1507–1515 ()

Full text

Abstract. The current transformation process of how energy is supplied attracts great interest from many different market players. As a consequence, many proprietary solutions for ``smart'' energy applications are flooding the market. This turns out to be rather a problem than part of the solution for the systematic development of future energy grids. Additionally, the absence of necessary standards blocks further developments that enable the creation of novel, market-driven and hybrid control solutions. To overcome these problems, we suggest a standardized control approach for hybrid energy systems by means of a so called Energy Option Model (EOM). This unifying model and the therewith developed decision support system provides the necessary technical understanding and the economic assessment options for network-connected energy conversion systems. Thus, it can be used for single on-site systems as well as for aggregated systems that are controlled in centralized or decentralized manner. This paper presents and discusses exemplary use cases for our EOM that illustrate the centralized as well as the decentralized use of our approach within hybrid energy systems. Overall, we believe that the EOM represents the key approach for a further systematic development of an open hybrid energy grid.

References

  1. V. Vyatkin, G. Zhabelova, N. Higgins, M. Ulieru, K. Schwarz, and N. C. Nair, “Standards-enabled Smart Grid for the future Energy Web,” in Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), 2010, 2010, pp. 1–9.
  2. C. Derksen, T. Linnenberg, R. Unland, and A. Fay, “Structure and Classification of Unified Energy Agents as a base for the systematic development of Future Energy Grids,” EAAI—Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2014.
  3. D. Nestle and J. Ringelstein, “Integration of DER into Distribution Grid Operation and Decentralized Energy Management,” Smart Grids Europe, vol. 19, 2009.
  4. [Online] Available at: http://www.e-energy.de/de/modellregionen.php
  5. A. Faruqui and S. Sergici, “Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 193–225, 2010.
  6. S. Vandael, N. Boucké, T. Holvoet, K. De Craemer, and G. Deconinck, “Decentralized Coordination of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles for Imbalance Reduction in a Smart Grid,” in The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2, 2011, pp. 803–810.
  7. A. Sternberg and A. Bardow, “Power-to-What? - Environmental assessment of energy storage systems,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 389–400, 2015.
  8. P. D. Lund, J. Lindgren, J. Mikkola, and J. Salpakari, “Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 45, pp. 785–807, 2015.
  9. T. Krishnamurti, D. Schwartz, A. Davis, B. Fischhoff, W. B. de Bruin, L. Lave, and J. Wang, “Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters,” Energy Policy, vol. 41, pp. 790–797, 2012.
  10. P. A. Ioannou and J. Sun, Robust adaptive control. Courier Corporation, 2012.
  11. [Online] Available at: http://www.modbus.org.
  12. R. E. Mackiewicz, “Overview of IEC 61850 and Benefits,” in Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition, 2005/2006 IEEE PES, 2006, pp. 376–383.
  13. C. Derksen, T. Linnenberg, R. Unland, and A. Fay, “Unified Energy Agents as a Base for the Systematic Development of Future Energy Grids.,” in MATES, 2013, vol. 8076, pp. 236–249.
  14. G. J. Van Wylen, R. E. Sonntag, and C. Borgnakke, Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics, no. Bd. 1. Wiley, 1994.
  15. D. J. Power, R. Sharda, and F. Burstein, Decision support systems. Wiley Online Library, 2002.
  16. J. Sudeikat, L. Braubach, A. Pokahr, W. Lamersdorf, and W. Renz, “Validation of BDI Agents,” in PROMAS, 2006, pp. 185–200.
  17. J. K. Kok, C. J. Warmer, and I. G. Kamphuis, “PowerMatcher: Multiagent Control in the Electricity Infrastructure,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2005, pp. 75–82.