Logo PTI
Polish Information Processing Society
Logo FedCSIS

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 8

Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems

The synthesis of a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school computing

, , ,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2016F159

Citation: Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 8, pages 927931 ()

Full text

Abstract. This study investigates the need for a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school Computer Science. In accordance with the pedagogy, a prototype e-learning software was developed for use in student instruction and independent learning. The pedagogy was iteratively refined based on the evaluation of teachers and education experts and the resulting e-learning software was developed considering student feedback. The problem domain focuses on the UK's recent shift in educational emphasis towards Computer Science GCSEs; however, the findings are broadly transferable to other developed nations. The pedagogy synthesizes the following learning theories: Constructivism, Social Constructivism, Connectivism, Cognitive Load, ARCS and VARK learning styles, these were in turn distilled into 31 heuristics. The research is broken into three phases, the first two phases are discussed in this paper; Phase 1 is the Initial Pedagogical Strategy and Prototype, Phase 2 is the Elaboration via Action Research.


  1. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Vines, J. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x
  2. Bell, T., Andreae, P. and Lambert, L., 2010, January. Computer science in New Zealand high schools. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education-Volume 103 (pp. 15-22). Australian Computer Society, Inc..
  3. Bessenyei, I. (2008). Learning and teaching in the information society. Elearning 2.0 and connectivism. Information Society, R.Pinter (Ed), Ed.Gondolat, 2008(9), 1–14.
  4. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD).
  5. CAS. (2011). Computing at School International Comparisons. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/internationalcomparisons-v5.pdf
  6. Chan, C. H., & Robbins, L. I. (2006). E-learning systems: Promises and pitfalls. Academic Psychiatry, 30(6), 491–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.6.491
  7. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 3rd Edition: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Computing at Schools Working. (2012). Computer Science: A curriculum for schools. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/ComputingCurric.pdf
  9. e-skills UK. (2012). Technology Insight 2012. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from http://www.e-skills.com/research/research-publications/insights-reports-and-videos/technology-insights-2012/
  10. Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137 – 155.
  11. Gove, M. (2012). Michael Gove gives a speech at the BETT Show 2012 on ICT in the National Curriculum. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speech-at-the-bett-show-2012
  12. Hadjerrouit, S. (2010). A conceptual framework for using and evaluating web-based learning resources in school education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 9(1), 53–79.
  13. Halse, M. . M., Mallinson, B., & Mallison, B. J. (2009). Investigating popular Internet applications as supporting e-learning technologies for teaching and learning with Generation Y. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 5(5), 58–71.
  14. Illeris, K. (Ed.). (2009). Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists In Their Own Words. New York: Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203870426
  15. ITU, I. T. U. (2013). Measuring the Information Society. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2013.aspx
  16. Keller, J. (2006). Development of two measures of learner motivation. Unpublished Manuscript in Progress. Florida State ....
  17. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2– 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
  18. Office of National Statistics. (2013). Internet Access - Households and Individuals, 2013. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access---households-and-individuals/2013/index.html
  19. Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of learning learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203887240
  20. Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  21. Susman, G., & Evered, R. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392581
  22. The Royal Society. (2012). Shut down or restart? The way forward for computing in UK schools. Technology. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from https://royalsociety.org/education/policy/computing-in-schools/report/
  23. Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00381.x
  24. Vygotsky, L., 1978. Interaction between learning and development, Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Constructivism+and+Learning.+cobb+1994&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5#1 [Accessed February 3, 2015].
  25. Reigeluth, C.M. ed., 2013. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203872130