Citation: Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 11, pages 1051–1055 (2017)
Abstract. Future warehouses will be made of modular embedded entities with communication ability and energy aware operation attached to the traditional materials handling and warehousing objects. This advancement is mainly to fulfill the flexibility and scalability needs of the emerging warehouses. However, it leads to a new layer of complexity during development and evaluation of such systems due to the multidisciplinarity in logistics, embedded systems, and wireless communications. Although each discipline provides theoretical approaches and simulations for these tasks, many issues are often discovered in a real deployment of the full system. In this paper we introduce PhyNetLab as a real scale warehouse testbed made of cyber physical objects (PhyNodes) developed for this type of application. The presented platform provides a possibility to check the industrial requirement of an IoT-based warehouse in addition to the typical wireless sensor networks tests. We describe the hardware and software components of the nodes in addition to the overall structure of the testbed. Finally, we will demonstrate the advantages of the testbed by evaluating the performance of the ETSI compliant radio channel access procedure for an IoT warehouse.
- M. Masoudinejad, J. Emmerich, D. Kossmann, A. Riesner, M. Roidl, and M. ten Hompel, “Development of a measurement platform for indoor photovoltaic energy harvesting in materials handling applications,” in 6th International Renewable Energy Congress, 2015, pp. 1–6.
- A. K. Ramachandran Venkatapathy, A. Riesner, M. Roidl, J. Emmerich, and M. ten Hompel, “PhyNode : An intelligent, cyber-physical system with energy neutral operation for PhyNetLab,” in Proceedings of Smart SysTech; European Conference on Smart Objects, Systems and Technologies;. VDE-Verl, 2015, pp. 1–8.
- J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1645–1660, Sep. 2013.
- A. Gluhak, S. Krco, M. Nati, D. Pfisterer, N. Mitton, and T. Razafindralambo, “A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 58–67, 2011.
- M. Masoudinejad, J. Emmerich, D. Kossmann, A. Riesner, M. Roidl, and M. ten Hompel, “A measurement platform for photovoltaic performance analysis in environments with ultra-low energy harvesting potential,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 25, pp. 74–81, 2015.
- L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The Internet of Things: A survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, Oct. 2010.
- L. P. Steyn and G. P. Hancke, “A survey of Wireless Sensor Network testbeds,” in AFRICON, 2011, 2011, pp. 1–6.
- G. Werner-Allen, P. Swieskowski, and M. Welsh, “MoteLab: A Wireless Sensor Network Testbed,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, ser. IPSN ’05. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2005.
- FIT consortium, “FIT/IoT-LAB Very large scale open wireless sensor network testbed.” [Online]. Available: https://www.iot-lab.info/
- A. K. Ramachandran Venkatapathy, M. Roidl, A. Riesner, J. Emmerich, and M. ten Hompel, “PhyNetLab: Architecture design of ultra-low power Wireless Sensor Network testbed,” in IEEE 16th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks. IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6.
- M. Doddavenkatappa, M. C. Chan, and A. L. Ananda, “Indriya: A Low-Cost, 3d Wireless Sensor Network Testbed,” in Testbeds and Research Infrastructure. Development of Networks and Communities, ser. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, T. Korakis, H. Li, P. Tran-Gia, and H.-S. Park, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, no. 90, pp. 302–316.
- H. Hellbrück, M. Pagel, A. Köller, D. Bimschas, D. Pfisterer, and S. Fischer, “Using and operating wireless sensor network testbeds with WISEBED,” in 2011 The 10th IFIP Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop, Jun. 2011, pp. 171–178.
- R. Falkenberg, C. Ide, and C. Wietfeld, “Client-based control channel analysis for connectivity estimation in LTE networks,” in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). Montréal, Canada: IEEE, sep 2016.
- O. Spinczyk, A. Gal, and W. Schröder-Preikschat, “AspectC++: An aspect-oriented extension to C++,” in Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems (TOOLS Pacific ’02), Sydney, Australia, Feb. 2002, pp. 53–60.
- O. Spinczyk and D. Lohmann, “The design and implementation of AspectC++,” Knowledge-Based Systems, Special Issue on Techniques to Produce Intelligent Secure Software, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 636–651, 2007.
- M. Buschhoff, C. Günter, and O. Spinczyk, “A unified approach for online and offline estimation of sensor platform energy consumption,” in 2012 8th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Aug 2012, pp. 1154–1158.
- N. Abramson, “The aloha system: Another alternative for computer communications,” in Proceedings of the November 17-19, 1970, Fall Joint Computer Conference, ser. AFIPS ’70 (Fall). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1970, pp. 281–285.
- M. Roidl, J. Emmerich, A. Riesner, M. Masoudinejad, D. Kaulbars, C. Ide, C. Wietfeld, and M. T. Hompel, “Performance availability evaluation of smart devices in materials handling systems,” in 2014 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China - Workshops (CIC/ICCC), Oct 2014, pp. 6–10.
- EN 300 220-1: Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Short Range Devices (SRD); Radio equipment to be used in the 25 MHz to 1000 MHz frequency range with power levels rang up to 500 mW, ETSI European Standard, Rev. V2.4.1, Jan. 2012.