Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2023F5836

Citation: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 35, pages 557–566 (2023)

Full text

Abstract. The average tenure of Chief Information Officers (CIOs) has increased over the past few years. Nevertheless, the average tenure of CIOs is shorter than that of Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). While most studies on tenure and background are based on data from US IT executives, studies on German CIOs are missing. This study analyzes the tenure of German CIOs as a proxy for management effectiveness and how certain factors influence it. An original and unique dataset of 384 IT executives from German companies is examined. The data include the size and industry sector of the companies, educational and professional backgrounds of the CIOs, and the CIOs' reporting lines. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The German CIOs had a median tenure of 4.0 years. However, if we examine executives who are currently in office and executives with a completed term of office separately, the median tenure differs. The results also show that German CIOs do not have shorter tenures than German CEOs. When compared with US CIOs, the results depend on the values selected for comparison. In addition, the analysis shows that neither the size and industry sector of the companies nor the educational and professional backgrounds of the CIOs and managers of the CIO reports have a statistically significant influence on the tenure of IT executives. The factors examined in this study can be considered as preconditions for the CIO position. In the future, factors that play a role during tenure should be examined.

References

1. S. S. Dikolli, W. J. Mayew, and D. Nanda, “CEO Tenure and the Performance-Turnover Relation,” Rev Account Stud, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 281–327, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9247-6.
2. L. Kappelman et al., “The 2019 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study,” MISQE, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 69–104, 2020.
3. Korn Ferry, Age and Tenure in the C-Suite. [Online]. Available: https://ir.kornferry.com/news-releases/news-release-details/age-and-tenure-c-suite-korn-ferry-study-reveals-trends-title-and
4. CIO Magazine, 2020 State of the CIO. [Online]. Available: https://www.idg.com/tools-for-marketers/2020-state-of-the-cio/
5. G. S. Dawson, M.-W. Ho, and R. J. Kauffman, “How Are C-Suite Executives Different? A Comparative Empirical Study of the Survival of American Chief Information Officers,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 74, pp. 88–101, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.03.005.
6. M. C. Jones, L. Kappelman, R. Pavur, Q. N. Nguyen, and V. L. Johnson, “Pathways to Being CIO: The Role of Background Revisited,” Information & Management, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1–14, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103234.
7. K. Drechsler, “Information Systems Executives: A Review and Research Agenda,” ECIS 2020 Research Papers, pp. 1–16, 2020.
8. G. M. Hunter, “The Chief Information Officer: A Review of the Role,” Journal of Information, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 125–143, 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/1328.
9. Strategy&, 2018 CEO Success Study. [Online]. Available: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/de/studien/ceo-success/ceo-success-gsa-deep-dive-2018.pdf
10. S. Neifar and H. Ajili, “CEO Characteristics, Accounting Opacity and Stock Price Synchronicity: Empirical Evidence From German Listed Firms,” J. Corp. Acct. Fin, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 29–43, 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22386.
11. V. Krotov, “Bridging the CIO-CEO Gap: It Takes Two to Tango,” Business Horizons, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.01.001.
12. D. J. Mazzola, R. D. St. Louis, and M. R. Tanniru, “The Path to the Top: Insights From Career Histories of Top CIOs,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 60–68, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2959086.
13. P. A. Gonzalez, L. Ashworth, and J. McKeen, “The CIO Stereotype: Content, Bias, and Impact,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 83–99, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.09.002.
14. R. Babin and K. A. Grant, “How Do CIOs Become CEOs?,” Journal of Global Information Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2019, https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.2019100101.
15. A. B. Gerth and J. Peppard, “The Dynamics of CIO Derailment: How CIOs Come Undone and How to Avoid it,” Business Horizons, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.001.
16. SpencerStuart, State of the CIO in 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/the-state-of-the-cio-in-2018
17. CIO Magazin, Top-500. [Online]. Available: https://www.cio.de/top500
18. T. M. Franke, T. Ho, and C. A. Christie, “The Chi-Square Test,” American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 448–458, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011426594.
19. S. Kratzer, M. Westner, and S. Strahringer, „Four Decades of Chief Information Officer Research: A Literature Review and Research Agenda Based on Main Path Analysis,” The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 54, no. 3, 2023.