Logo PTI Logo FedCSIS

Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 30

On Multiplicative, Additive and Qualitative Pairwise Comparisons

,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2022F57

Citation: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 30, pages 247–251 ()

Full text

Abstract. A relationship between the classical multiplicative pairwise comparisons that are based on aijaji = 1, the additive model based on bij+bji = 1, and qualitative pairwise comparisons that uses the relations ≈ (indifferent), ⊏ (slightly in favour of), ⊂ (in favour of), < ( strongly better) and ≺ (extremely better), is discussed in detail. A special attention is paid to the concept of consistency and weights calculations. An on-line tool is also discussed.

References

  1. J. Barzilai, Deriving weights for pairwise comparison matrices, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, 1226-1232, 1997.
  2. Bozóki S., Rapcsák T., On Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices, Journal of Global Optimization, 42, 2 (2008), 157-175.
  3. Bradley R. M., Terry M. E., The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons, Biometrika 39, 324-345 (1952)
  4. Cowan N., The magical number four in short-term memory. A reconsideration of mental storage capacity, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 24 (2001) 87-185
  5. Janicki R., Pairwise Comparisons Based Non-Numerical Ranking, Fundamenta Informaticae 94 (2009), 197-217.
  6. Janicki R., Finding Consistent Weights Assignments with Combined Pairwise Comparisons, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 17, 3 (2018) 322-347.
  7. Janicki R., Soudkhah M. H., On Classification with Pairwise Comparisons, Support Vector Machines and Feature Domain Overlapping, The Computer Journal 58, 3 (2015), 416-431
  8. Janicki R., Zhai Y., On a Pairwise Comparison Based Consistent Non-Numerical Ranking, Logic Journal of IGPL, 20, 4, 667-676 (2012)
  9. Janicki R., Zhai Y., Remarks on Pairwise Comparison Numerical and Non-Numerical Rankings, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6954, Springer 2011, pp. 290-300.
  10. Koczkodaj W. W., A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 18 (1993) 79-84.
  11. Koczkodaj, W.W., Kosiek, M., Szybowski, J. and Xu D., Fast convergence of distance-based inconsistency in pairwise comparisons’, Fundamenta Informaticae, 137,3 (2015) 355–367
  12. Koczkodaj W. W., Szarek S. J., On distance-based inconsistency reduction algorithms for pairwise comparisons, Logic Journal of the IGPL 18, 6 (2009) 859-869.
  13. Kong F., Liu H., Applying fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce, International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, 1, 3-4 (2005) 406-412.
  14. Mahmoud M., PiXR: Pairwise Matrix Inconsistency Reduction Tool, https://pixr-tool.github.io/
  15. Miller G. A., The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two, The Psychological Review, 63, 2 (1956) 81-97.
  16. Mirdad A., Janicki R., Applications of Mixed Pairwise Comparisons, Proc. of ICAI’2015 (International Conference on Artificial Intelligence), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, July 27-30, 2015, pp. 414-420, CSREA Press
  17. Saaty T. L., A Scaling Methods for Priorities in Hierarchical Structure, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15 (1977) 234-281.
  18. Saaty T. L., Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh 2005.